NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M5000 and ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 861 MHz vs 669 MHz
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 2x 320
- 5x better floating-point performance: 4,252 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1656 MHz
- 11.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9411 vs 822
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 660 vs 422
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 vs 4 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 861 MHz vs 669 MHz |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 2x 320 |
Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1656 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9411 vs 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 660 vs 422 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
- Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 150 Watt
Texture fill rate | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M5000
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9411 | 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 660 | 422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 99.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1183.119 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.364 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 498.551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3677 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3677 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GM204 | RV670 |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 | 4 April 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,856.99 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 346 | 349 |
Price now | $1,498 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.47 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 861 MHz | 669 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops | 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 320 |
Texture fill rate | 132.9 GTexel / s | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo, 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | 256 Bit | GDDR3 |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 53.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |