NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M5000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 861 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 30.8x more texture fill rate: 132.9 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 256x more pipelines: 2048 vs 8
- 246.1x better floating-point performance: 4,252 gflops vs 17.28 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
- 6.6x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 86.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9387 vs 108
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 658 vs 481
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 vs 6 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 861 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 132.9 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops vs 17.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9387 vs 108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 658 vs 481 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 150 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9387 | 108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 658 | 481 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28201 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 99.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1183.119 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.364 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 498.551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3677 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3677 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GM204 | G98 |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 | 6 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,856.99 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 341 | 321 |
Price now | $1,498 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.47 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 861 MHz | 540 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops | 17.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 132.9 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo, 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | 1x DMS-59 |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 198 mm |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | None |
Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | 256 Bit | DDR2 |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |