NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs Intel HD Graphics 5600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile and Intel HD Graphics 5600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 3.5x more core clock speed: 1041 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
  • 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6338 vs 2872
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1692 vs 1598
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1692 vs 1598
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 January 2017 vs 5 September 2014
Core clock speed 1041 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 24
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 6338 vs 2872
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1692 vs 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1692 vs 1598

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5600

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 463 vs 227
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2264 vs 1870
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3330 vs 3011
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3330 vs 3011
Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 463 vs 227
PassMark - G3D Mark 2264 vs 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3330 vs 3011
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3330 vs 3011

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5600

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
227
463
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1870
2264
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6338
2872
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1692
1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1692
1598
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3011
3330
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3011
3330
Name NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile Intel HD Graphics 5600
PassMark - G2D Mark 227 463
PassMark - G3D Mark 1870 2264
Geekbench - OpenCL 6338 2872
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3079
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1692 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1692 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3011 3330
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3011 3330

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile Intel HD Graphics 5600

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Generation 8.0
Code name GM108 Broadwell GT2
Launch date 11 January 2017 5 September 2014
Place in performance rating 951 746
Type Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 1041 MHz 300 MHz
Floating-point performance 799.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 384 24
Texture fill rate 16.66 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt
Boost clock speed 1050 MHz
Transistor count 1,300 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x1

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 40.1 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync