NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs Intel Iris Graphics 550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile and Intel Iris Graphics 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1041 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1873 vs 1427
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3079 vs 2675
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3079 vs 2675
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1692 vs 1290
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1692 vs 1290
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1041 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1873 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3079 vs 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3079 vs 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1692 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1692 vs 1290 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 305 vs 227
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7012 vs 6059
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3157 vs 3011
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3157 vs 3011
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 vs 227 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 vs 6059 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3157 vs 3011 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3157 vs 3011 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 550
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile | Intel Iris Graphics 550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 227 | 305 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1873 | 1427 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6059 | 7012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3079 | 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3079 | 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1692 | 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1692 | 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3011 | 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3011 | 3157 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | GM108 | Skylake GT3e |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 957 | 958 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1041 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 799.5 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 16.66 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |