NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M600M and AMD Radeon HD 7610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 360.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2177 vs 632
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5832 vs 5257
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 2632
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 2632
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3339
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3339
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 7 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 360.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2177 vs 632 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5832 vs 5257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 vs 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 vs 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3339 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7610M
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 357
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 400 vs 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 vs 357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7610M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M600M | AMD Radeon HD 7610M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2177 | 632 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 | 479 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5832 | 5257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 | 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 | 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3339 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M600M | AMD Radeon HD 7610M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM107 | Whistler |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 7 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 673 | 667 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 360.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |