AMD Radeon Pro 455 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 455 and NVIDIA Quadro M600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 455
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 41.04 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 52% better floating-point performance: 1,313 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3113 vs 2177
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 357
- Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11291 vs 5832
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4146 vs 2945
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4146 vs 2945
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 October 2016 vs 18 August 2015 |
| Texture fill rate | 41.04 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3113 vs 2177 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11291 vs 5832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4146 vs 2945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4146 vs 2945 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M600M
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 1762
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 1762
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 vs 1762 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 vs 1762 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 455
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M600M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 455 | NVIDIA Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3113 | 2177 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11291 | 5832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.484 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 573.646 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.854 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.793 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.673 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4146 | 2945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1762 | 3681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4146 | 2945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1762 | 3681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 455 | NVIDIA Quadro M600M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Baffin | GM107 |
| Launch date | 30 October 2016 | 18 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 671 | 673 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 41.04 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,870 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 455 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
ATIRadeon X1550
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M600M
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
