AMD Radeon Pro 455 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 455 and NVIDIA Quadro M600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 455
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 41.04 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 52% better floating-point performance: 1,313 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3113 vs 2171
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 337
- Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11544 vs 5983
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4146 vs 2945
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4146 vs 2945
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 October 2016 vs 18 August 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 41.04 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3113 vs 2171 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 337 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11544 vs 5983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4146 vs 2945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4146 vs 2945 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M600M
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 1762
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 1762
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 vs 1762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 vs 1762 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 455
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M600M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 455 | NVIDIA Quadro M600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3113 | 2171 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 337 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11544 | 5983 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.484 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 573.646 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.793 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.673 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4146 | 2945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1762 | 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4146 | 2945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1762 | 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 455 | NVIDIA Quadro M600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Baffin | GM107 |
Launch date | 30 October 2016 | 18 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 692 | 694 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 41.04 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,870 million |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |