NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs AMD FirePro D300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M600M and AMD FirePro D300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 3397
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 3397
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 18 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 vs 3397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 vs 3397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 68 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2,176 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19628 vs 5832
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6054 vs 2945
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6054 vs 2945
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 68 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,176 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19628 vs 5832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6054 vs 2945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6054 vs 2945 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M600M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D300
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M600M | AMD FirePro D300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2177 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5832 | 19628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2945 | 6054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2945 | 6054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 | 3397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 | 3397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M600M | AMD FirePro D300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 18 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 673 | 675 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 242 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 162.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |