NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs Intel HD Graphics 530

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 756 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 31.26 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
  • 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
  • 2.5x better floating-point performance: 1,000 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
  • Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 391 vs 254
  • 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2775 vs 995
  • Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8073 vs 4397
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3854 vs 1045
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3854 vs 1045
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2393
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2393
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 January 2017 vs 1 September 2015
Core clock speed 756 MHz vs 350 MHz
Texture fill rate 31.26 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 512 vs 24
Floating-point performance 1,000 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 391 vs 254
PassMark - G3D Mark 2775 vs 995
Geekbench - OpenCL 8073 vs 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3854 vs 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3854 vs 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3346

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

  • Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 977 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
  • 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 977 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Maximum memory size 64 GB vs 2 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
391
254
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2775
995
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8073
4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3854
1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3854
1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
2393
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3346
Name NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile Intel HD Graphics 530
PassMark - G2D Mark 391 254
PassMark - G3D Mark 2775 995
Geekbench - OpenCL 8073 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3854 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3854 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3346
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 30.177
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 384

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile Intel HD Graphics 530

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Generation 9.0
Code name GM107 Skylake GT2
Launch date 11 January 2017 1 September 2015
Place in performance rating 584 1248
Type Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 977 MHz 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 756 MHz 350 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,000 gflops 403.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 512 24
Texture fill rate 31.26 GTexel / s 25.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x1

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4
Shared memory 1