NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3685
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3685

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 25 October 2016
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3685

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 756 MHz
Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 977 MHz
Around 86% higher texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
Around 86% better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 391
Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 2775
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 8073
Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 3854
Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 3854

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1290 MHz vs 756 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz vs 977 MHz
Texture fill rate	58.2 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 512
Floating-point performance	1,862 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	457 vs 391
PassMark - G3D Mark	5029 vs 2775
Geekbench - OpenCL	17466 vs 8073
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7043 vs 3854
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7043 vs 3854
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

391

457

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

5029

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8073

17466

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3854

7043

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3854

7043

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3360

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3360

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark	391	457
PassMark - G3D Mark	2775	5029
Geekbench - OpenCL	8073	17466
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3854	7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3854	7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3360
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		223.683
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		122

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Pascal
Code name	GM107	GP107
Launch date	11 January 2017	25 October 2016
Place in performance rating	584	586
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$109
Price now		$124.99
Value for money (0-100)		56.95
Technical info
Boost clock speed	977 MHz	1392 MHz
Core clock speed	756 MHz	1290 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,000 gflops	1,862 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	512	640
Texture fill rate	31.26 GTexel / s	58.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,300 million
CUDA cores		640
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Height		4.38" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		300 Watt
Supplementary power connectors		None
Width		2-slot
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s	112 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GameStream
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
VR Ready