NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 756 MHz
• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 977 MHz
• Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
• Around 49% better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 vs 2775
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 391
• Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 8073
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3718
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3358
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3718
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3854 vs 3575
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3854 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 2775
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	549 391
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 8073
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 3854
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 3854
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3358

Compare specifications (specs)