NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M vs ATI Radeon X1300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M and ATI Radeon X1300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 4x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 600 MHz vs 500 MHz
| Launch date | 1 June 2006 vs 5 October 2005 |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1300
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 1.8 GTexel / s vs 1.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 58 vs 48
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s vs 1.2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 90 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 58 vs 48 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 vs 236 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1300
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M | ATI Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 48 | 58 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | 237 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M | ATI Radeon X1300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Curie | R500 |
| Code name | G72 | RV516 |
| Launch date | 1 June 2006 | 5 October 2005 |
| Place in performance rating | 774 | 777 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 4 | |
| Texture fill rate | 1.2 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 112 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 4.8 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 600 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | 64 | DDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CineFX 4.0 | ||
| Intellisample 4.0 | ||
| PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
| UltraShadow II | ||