NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M and ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
| Launch date | 1 June 2006 vs 1 February 2006 |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon X1600
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 1.8 GTexel / s vs 1.2 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 12 vs 4
- Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 940 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 92 vs 48
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 450 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s vs 1.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 12 vs 4 |
| Memory clock speed | 940 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 92 vs 48 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X1600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M | ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 48 | 92 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | 236 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M | ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Curie | R500 |
| Code name | G72 | M56 |
| Launch date | 1 June 2006 | 1 February 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 774 | 775 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 4 | 12 |
| Texture fill rate | 1.2 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 112 million | 157 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 4.8 GB / s | 15.04 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 600 Bit | 470 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Memory type | 64 | 128 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CineFX 4.0 | ||
| Intellisample 4.0 | ||
| PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
| UltraShadow II | ||
| Powerplay 6.0 | ||