NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M and NVIDIA GeForce 9200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 46 vs 27
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 vs 27 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9200
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 169 vs 79
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 502 vs 169
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 502 vs 169
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 169 vs 79 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 502 vs 169 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 502 vs 169 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M | NVIDIA GeForce 9200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 79 | 169 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 | 27 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 169 | 502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 169 | 502 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M | NVIDIA GeForce 9200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G86 | C78 |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1681 | 1684 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3, GDDR2 | |
Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
nView |