NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 975 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 185 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3264
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3264
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5923 vs 2810
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5923 vs 2810
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 19 November 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 975 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 185 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 vs 2810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 vs 2810 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
- Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 93.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- Around 58% better floating-point performance: 2,995 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
| Texture fill rate | 93.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 | 2810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 | 2810 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4470 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.399 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1230.47 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.371 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.519 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 345.793 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1745 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 19 November 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 542 | 539 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $270 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 2,995 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 93.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 185 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 192.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon X700 PRO
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4830
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID K280Q
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
