NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3687
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3687
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3336
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1303 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 5923
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 5923
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1303 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 5923 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 | 8496 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20734 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP107 | GP106B |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 1 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 544 | 545 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 2,488 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 4,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 112.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon X700 PRO
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4270
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
