NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 370X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 370X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5600 MHz
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 27 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
- Around 39% better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 5923
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 5923
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 vs 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 vs 5923 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 370X |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 | 8393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 | 8393 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 370X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Trinidad |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 27 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 525 | 526 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 2,637 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1280 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 82.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 179.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |

