NVIDIA Quadro P3000 vs AMD FirePro W8100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3000 and AMD FirePro W8100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1088 MHz vs 824 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 220 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9579 vs 5494
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3699
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9579 vs 5494
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3699
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 23 June 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1088 MHz vs 824 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 220 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9579 vs 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9579 vs 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8100
- 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7333 vs 6484
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 727 vs 425
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34705 vs 25929
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1280 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7333 vs 6484 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 727 vs 425 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34705 vs 25929 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | AMD FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6484 | 7333 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 425 | 727 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25929 | 34705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9579 | 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9579 | 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3489 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.339 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2333.922 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.816 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.45 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 440.107 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | AMD FirePro W8100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | N17E-Q1 | Hawaii |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 23 June 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 393 | 395 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1088 MHz | 824 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2560 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 220 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HD сomponent video output | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 168 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P3000 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5725
NVIDIAQuadro P3000 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
NVIDIAQuadro P3000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M XT
NVIDIAQuadro P3000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 280X
NVIDIAQuadro P3000 vs
AMDFirePro W8100
NVIDIAQuadro P3000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X
