NVIDIA Quadro P3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3654
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3654
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 15 August 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1088 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7008 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 vs 6636
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29491 vs 25146
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 9579
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 9579
- Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3667 vs 3489
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1088 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 7008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 vs 6636 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29491 vs 25146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 9579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 9579 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3667 vs 3489 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6636 | 8161 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25146 | 29491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9579 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9579 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3489 | 3667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | N17E-Q1 | GP106B |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 382 | 401 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1088 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168 GB / s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large |