AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA Quadro P3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 10% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 9579
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 9579
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36495 vs 25932
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 11 January 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 7008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 vs 9579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 vs 9579 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36495 vs 25932 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3000
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1088 MHz vs 1036 MHz
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 429 vs 367
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6506 vs 4307
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3695
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1088 MHz vs 1036 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 vs 367 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6506 vs 4307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 9579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 9579 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36495 | 25932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 429 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4307 | 6506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3489 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 14 | N17E-Q1 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 11 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 388 | 391 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 1088 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
HDMI | ||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 168 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |