NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36732 vs 32384
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13448 vs 10566
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13448 vs 10566
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3697
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3697
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3338
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3338
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 18 August 2016 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36732 vs 32384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13448 vs 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13448 vs 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3338 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1139 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1404 MHz
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7012 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9796 vs 9156
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 540
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1139 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 1404 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 7012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 vs 9156 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 vs 540 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9156 | 9796 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | 772 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36732 | 32384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13448 | 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13448 | 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 156 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP104 | GP106 |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 18 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 274 | 388 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1404 MHz | 1708 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1139 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 4,400 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1152 | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 250 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
