NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10139 vs 9409
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57692 vs 36065
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 13448
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 13448
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10139 vs 9409 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57692 vs 36065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 13448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 13448 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1139 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 554 vs 497
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1139 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 554 vs 497 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10139 | 9409 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 554 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57692 | 36065 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 227.936 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2031.737 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.93 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 121.562 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 568.183 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 13448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 13448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5425 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA106 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 21 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 270 | 267 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1139 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12000 million | 7,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 7012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Embedded
