NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1404 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9903 vs 9078
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56602 vs 36659
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1404 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9903 vs 9078 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56602 vs 36659 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1139 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 488
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13448 vs 12750
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13448 vs 12750
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1139 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 vs 488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13448 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13448 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9903 | 9078 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 549 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56602 | 36659 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 13448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 13448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA106 | GP104 |
| Place in performance rating | 274 | 273 |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1139 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 7,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 7012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
