NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 7.6x more texture fill rate: 34.92 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
- 24.3x better floating-point performance: 1,117 gflops vs 46 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3327 vs 524
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 vs 275
- 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11181 vs 2143
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.134 vs 7.844
- 16.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.164 vs 8.335
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4662 vs 817
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1381
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3044
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4662 vs 817
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1381
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3044
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 3 September 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops vs 46 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 vs 524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 vs 275 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 vs 2143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 vs 7.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 vs 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 vs 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 vs 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3044 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 40 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 | 524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 | 275 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | 2143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | 7.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P600 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | GP107 | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 3 September 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
Place in performance rating | 556 | 1421 |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | 46 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s | 4.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |