NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs Intel HD Graphics 530
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 34.92 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 1,117 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3327 vs 995
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 vs 254
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11181 vs 4397
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.134 vs 30.747
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.164 vs 30.177
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4662 vs 1045
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2393
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4662 vs 1045
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2393
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops vs 403.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 vs 995 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 vs 254 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 vs 4397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 vs 30.747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 vs 30.177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 vs 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 vs 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 | 995 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 | 254 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | 4397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | 30.747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | 30.177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P600 | Intel HD Graphics 530 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Skylake GT2 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
Place in performance rating | 556 | 1248 |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | 403.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 |