NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 15.9x more texture fill rate: 34.92 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- 48x more pipelines: 384 vs 8
- 49.9x better floating-point performance: 1,117 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 35.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3270 vs 93
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 334
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 15 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3270 vs 93 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 vs 334 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 40 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3270 | 93 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 | 334 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
Code name | GP107 | G98 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 15 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
Place in performance rating | 597 | 484 |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s | 2.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |