NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 945A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GeForce 945A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 1072 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1176 MHz
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 34.92 GTexel / s vs 28.22 GTexel / s
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 1,117 gflops vs 903.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3271 vs 1852
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.134 vs 28.865
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.164 vs 107.63
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 1072 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1176 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s vs 28.22 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops vs 903.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3271 vs 1852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 vs 28.865 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 vs 107.63 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945A
- Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 716 vs 472
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32359 vs 11181
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 716 vs 472 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32359 vs 11181 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce 945A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3271 | 1852 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 | 716 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | 32359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | 28.865 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | 107.63 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 381.898 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.793 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce 945A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP107 | GM108 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
Place in performance rating | 597 | 598 |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | 1176 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | 903.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s | 28.22 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |