NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA Quadro P600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 1,117 gflops
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4012 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 vs 3327
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 542
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 11181
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 vs 35.134
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 vs 141.164
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3715
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3359
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3715
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3359
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 7 February 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 46.56 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops vs 1,117 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 vs 3327 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 vs 542 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 vs 11181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 vs 35.134 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 vs 141.164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1354 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4662 vs 3575
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4662 vs 3575
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1354 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 vs 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 vs 3575 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 3327 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 542 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 11181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 35.134 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 141.164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 4662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 4662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP107 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 7 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 583 | 556 |
| Price now | $176.99 | $169.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 25.53 | 22.11 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1354 MHz | 1557 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 1329 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops | 1,117 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 46.56 GTexel / s | 34.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 145 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 64.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |

