NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 559 vs 464
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 30.523
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3685
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3360
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3685
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3360

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1266 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1354 MHz
• Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
• Around 25% better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 1,490 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5049 vs 3625
• Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16794 vs 12475
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 43.877
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 773.248
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 3.082
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 184.343
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 3575
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3625 5049
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	559 464
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 16794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3360

Compare specifications (specs)