NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 16952
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 16952
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68858 vs 61407
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 22 February 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 vs 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 vs 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68858 vs 61407 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 vs 566
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12931 vs 12794
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 vs 566 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12931 vs 12794 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | 813 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 | 12931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3355 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68858 | 61407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6260 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | TU116 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 22 February 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 181 | 200 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Price now | $279.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
