NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 965 vs 566

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

• Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
• Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 130 Watt
• 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12794 vs 12051
• Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68858 vs 60907

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	965 566
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12051 12794
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	60907 68858

Compare specifications (specs)