NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 10008 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12495 vs 11452
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 17105
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 17105
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71111 vs 48976
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 10008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12495 vs 11452 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 vs 17105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 vs 17105 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71111 vs 48976 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 548
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5581 vs 3716
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5581 vs 3716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5581 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5581 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 | 724 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12495 | 11452 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 17105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 17105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 5581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 5581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3360 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71111 | 48976 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6008 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | GP104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 189 | 186 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1468 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 7,516 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 234.9 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
