NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 500 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 17.707
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 31 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 500 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 vs 17.707 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137262 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | 17.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU102 | New Zealand |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 31 August 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | $899 |
Place in performance rating | 103 | 321 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 500 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 4,313 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,789 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 118.4 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 292 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 264.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |