NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20430 vs 19305
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 988 vs 861
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 21578
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3290
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 21578
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3290

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
• Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 147323 vs 109075
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 323.141
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 4829.953
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 35.311
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 150.943
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1477.456

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	20430 19305
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 861
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	109075 147323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	323.141 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4829.953 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.311 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	150.943 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1477.456 2101.927
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3290

Compare specifications (specs)