NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon HD 7990
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon HD 7990 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 795 / 1230 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8878 vs 6689
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8878 vs 6689
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6738 vs 5566
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 24 April 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 vs 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 vs 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6738 vs 5566 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7990
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 768
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 2x 3 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 427
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 768 |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 3 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 427 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7990
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 | 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 | 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 | 766 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6738 | 5566 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33747 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 88.665 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1753.494 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.437 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.328 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 434.598 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 7990 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N19P-Q1 | Malta |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 24 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 375 | 417 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $1,126.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.87 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2x 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 4,096 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 375 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 307 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 2x 288.0 GB / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 280X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla K80
