NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 795 / 1230 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 902 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33657 vs 24089
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 902 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33657 vs 24089 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- 3.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 768
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 8878
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 8878
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 535 vs 437
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8060 vs 6702
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 vs 8878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 vs 8878 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 535 vs 437 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8060 vs 6702 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 | 535 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6702 | 8060 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33657 | 24089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.178 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1816.61 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.435 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.889 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 355.166 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | N19P-Q1 | GK110B |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 371 | 374 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,265 | |
Price now | $833.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 902 MHz |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2880 |
Floating-point performance | 5,196 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 216.5 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |