NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 10802.1x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 9.6 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 80 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1600 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 397
- 11x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6899 vs 628
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 12 December 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s vs 9.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 320 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 vs 397 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6899 vs 628 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41088 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 397 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6899 | 628 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale |
Code name | TU117 | R600 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 12 December 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 389 | 381 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 80 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 9.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 720 million |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 118.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |