AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 103.7 GTexel/s
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 7682
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 7682
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s vs 103.7 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 vs 7682 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 vs 7682 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1036 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1445 MHz
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41088 vs 36495
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 372
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6890 vs 4494
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1036 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1445 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41088 vs 36495 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 vs 372 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6890 vs 4494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 7682 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 7682 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36495 | 41088 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 372 | 423 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4494 | 6890 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 14 | TU117 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 387 | 389 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | 3.318 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1408 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | 51.84 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 103.7 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |