NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 380

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

AMD Radeon R9 380

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 970 MHz
954.9x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
4.8x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 190 Watt
2.1x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 970 MHz
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7682 vs 7635
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7682 vs 7635
Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6871 vs 6081

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz vs 970 MHz
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 190 Watt
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 970 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7682 vs 7635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7682 vs 7635
PassMark - G3D Mark	6871 vs 6081

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380

Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 vs 41046
Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 653 vs 405

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1792 vs 1024
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3703
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3703
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3356
Geekbench - OpenCL	76397 vs 41046
PassMark - G2D Mark	653 vs 405

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

7635

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

7635

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3359

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41046

76397

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

405

653

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6871

6081

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	AMD Radeon R9 380
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7682	7635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7682	7635
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3359
Geekbench - OpenCL	41046	76397
PassMark - G2D Mark	405	653
PassMark - G3D Mark	6871	6081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		58.135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1503.633
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2791

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	AMD Radeon R9 380
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Code name	TU117	Antigua
Launch date	27 May 2019	18 June 2015
Place in performance rating	395	370
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$199
Price now		$264.99
Value for money (0-100)		31.71
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	970 MHz
Core clock speed	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1792
Pixel fill rate	51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s	108.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	190 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	5,000 million
Compute units		28
Floating-point performance		3,476 gflops
Stream Processors		1792
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	2 x 6-pin
Width	IGP
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot
Length		221 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	182.4 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)	970 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore