NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 380

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 970 MHz
  • 954.9x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 190 Watt
  • 2.1x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 970 MHz
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8763 vs 7635
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8763 vs 7635
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7295 vs 6208
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed 1620 MHz vs 970 MHz
Texture fill rate 103.7 GTexel/s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt vs 190 Watt
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 970 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8763 vs 7635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8763 vs 7635
PassMark - G3D Mark 7295 vs 6208

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380

  • Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
  • Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 vs 40830
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 654 vs 439
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1792 vs 1024
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3358
Geekbench - OpenCL 76397 vs 40830
PassMark - G2D Mark 654 vs 439

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8763
7635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8763
7635
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3359
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
40830
76397
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
439
654
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7295
6208
Name NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q AMD Radeon R9 380
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8763 7635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8763 7635
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3359
Geekbench - OpenCL 40830 76397
PassMark - G2D Mark 439 654
PassMark - G3D Mark 7295 6208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 58.135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1503.633
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2776

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q AMD Radeon R9 380

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 3.0
Code name TU117 Antigua
Launch date 27 May 2019 18 June 2015
Place in performance rating 222 205
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $199
Price now $264.99
Value for money (0-100) 31.71

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1620 MHz 970 MHz
Core clock speed 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 1792
Pixel fill rate 51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 103.7 GTexel/s 108.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt 190 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 5,000 million
Compute units 28
Floating-point performance 3,476 gflops
Stream Processors 1792

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2 x 6-pin
Width IGP
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot
Length 221 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 182.4 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) 970 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore