NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro VX 200
- 12.6x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 112 vs 40
- 6.3x better floating-point performance: 252 gflops vs 40 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 112 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 252 gflops vs 40 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 75 Watt
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro VX 200
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450
Name | NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 91 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G92 | M82 |
Launch date | 8 January 2008 | 7 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 685 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 252 gflops | 40 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 112 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 / GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Powerplay |