NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation and NVIDIA RTX A4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 140 Watt
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19649 vs 19545
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 140 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19649 vs 19545 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 266.4 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 5120
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 vs 693
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 vs 115284
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 266.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 6144 vs 5120 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 vs 693 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 vs 115284 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 693 | 1026 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19649 | 19545 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 115284 | 121768 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD104 | GA104 |
| Place in performance rating | 65 | 108 |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 6144 |
| Pixel fill rate | 106.6 GPixel/s | 149.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 266.4 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Transistor count | 35800 million | 17400 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | Single-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon Pro V520
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAA10G
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX A5500 Mobile
