NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation

• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 2025 MHz vs 1815 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
• 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 200 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 737 vs 522
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15962 vs 11503
• Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 59348

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	522 737
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11503 15962
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	59348 105171

Compare specifications (specs)