NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation

• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 2025 MHz vs 1815 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
• 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 200 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 733 vs 524
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15940 vs 11304
• Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 58808

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	524 733
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11304 15940
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	58808 105171

Compare specifications (specs)