NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 and AMD Radeon Pro W6600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 86% higher pipelines: 3328 vs 1792
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 947
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 vs 8 Jun 2021 |
| Pipelines | 3328 vs 1792 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 947 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73337 vs 73128 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- 3.9x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 562 MHz
- 2.4x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15383 vs 13585
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 562 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15383 vs 13585 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 947 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13585 | 15383 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73337 | 73128 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1345 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | GA106 | Navi 23 |
| Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 | 8 Jun 2021 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | $649 |
| Place in performance rating | 128 | 63 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 2903 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 10.40 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3328 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | 185.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 325.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 11060 million |
| Compute units | 28 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | Single-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 167 mm (6.6 inches) | 241 mm (9.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | 69 mm (2.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |