NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 590 GME videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 199.7 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12530 vs 8574
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20429 vs 5140
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20429 vs 5140
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12530 vs 8574 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 vs 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 vs 5140 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 661 vs 503
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 3710
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 3710
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 3356
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 vs 503 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 503 | 661 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12530 | 8574 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 | 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 | 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 6839 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 6839 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 20161 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 20161 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78966 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4431 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GA104 | Polaris 20 |
Place in performance rating | 168 | 203 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.7 GFLOPS (1:64) | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (1:1) | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS | 6.359 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 44.16 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | 198.7 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 5700 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |