NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1080 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20429 vs 20206
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20429 vs 20206
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1080 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 vs 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 vs 20206 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 199.7 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85558 vs 78966
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 199.7 GTexel/s |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85558 vs 78966 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 503 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12530 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78966 | 85558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
| Place in performance rating | 168 | 194 |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.7 GFLOPS (1:64) | 222.5 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (1:1) | 14.24 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 13600 million |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
