NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile

  • Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1745 MHz vs 1695 MHz
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 350 Watt
  • Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1745 MHz vs 1695 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 140 Watt vs 350 Watt
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

  • Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 915 MHz
  • Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 279.2 GTexel/s
  • 2.1x more pipelines: 10496 vs 5120
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 25496
  • Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 25496
  • Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 vs 572
  • Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26747 vs 15306
  • Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191350 vs 99679
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1395 MHz vs 915 MHz
Texture fill rate 556.0 GTexel/s vs 279.2 GTexel/s
Pipelines 10496 vs 5120
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 33398 vs 25496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 33398 vs 25496
PassMark - G2D Mark 1050 vs 572
PassMark - G3D Mark 26747 vs 15306
Geekbench - OpenCL 191350 vs 99679

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25496
33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25496
33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3354
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
572
1050
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15306
26747
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
99679
191350
Name NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25496 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25496 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3354
PassMark - G2D Mark 572 1050
PassMark - G3D Mark 15306 26747
Geekbench - OpenCL 99679 191350
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 732.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7585.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 63.011
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2441.384
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 19948

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Ampere
Code name GA104 GA102
Place in performance rating 133 45
Launch date 1 Sep 2020
Launch price (MSRP) $1499
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1745 MHz 1695 MHz
Core clock speed 915 MHz 1395 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 558.4 GFLOPS (1:32) 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 17.87 TFLOPS (1:1) 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 17.87 TFLOPS 35.58 TFLOPS
Pipelines 5120 10496
Pixel fill rate 139.6 GPixel/s 189.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 279.2 GTexel/s 556.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 140 Watt 350 Watt
Transistor count 17400 million 28300 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 12-pin
Height 138 mm (5.4 inches)
Length 313 mm (12.3 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 750 Watt
Width Triple-slot

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.2
OpenCL 3.0 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.6 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Memory bandwidth 384 GB/s 936.2 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 384 bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6X