NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1745 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1745 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 279.2 GTexel/s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 10496 vs 5120
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 25496
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 25496
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 vs 572
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26747 vs 15306
- Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191350 vs 99679
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 279.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 5120 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 25496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 25496 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1050 vs 572 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26747 vs 15306 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191350 vs 99679 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25496 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25496 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | 1050 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15306 | 26747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99679 | 191350 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19948 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA104 | GA102 |
Place in performance rating | 133 | 45 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1745 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 558.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.87 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.87 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5120 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 139.6 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 279.2 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Width | Triple-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |