NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.8x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2176
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 vs 16476
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 vs 856
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 vs 87635
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 241.214
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 vs 3870.683
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 vs 27.021
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 vs 160.92
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 1269.445
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 20969
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 20969
- 1302x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2604 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 2 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 2176 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 vs 16476 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 vs 856 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 vs 87635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 vs 241.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 vs 3870.683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 vs 27.021 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 vs 160.92 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 vs 1269.445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 vs 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 vs 20969 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 vs 2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- 2x more core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 vs 3715
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 vs 3355
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 vs 3715
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 | 16476 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 | 856 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 | 87635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 241.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 3870.683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 27.021 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 160.92 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 1269.445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 5026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 5026 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 | 2 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU106 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 2 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 108 | 148 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1470 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2176 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 10.8 B |
CUDA cores | 2176 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 9.0” (228.60mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 8 pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2-Slot |
Height | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |