NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
- 8x more pipelines: 6144 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 vs 6494
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 vs 404
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 vs 32981
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 87.83
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 9009
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 9009
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 27 May 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 vs 6494 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 vs 404 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 vs 32981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 vs 87.83 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 vs 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 vs 9009 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 | 6494 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 | 404 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 | 32981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 87.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU117 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 108 | 400 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 69.84 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 4.470 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | 2.235 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | 46.56 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 69.84 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 128 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |