NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
- Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 302.4 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26506 vs 20002
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26506 vs 20002
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16138 vs 13689
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 114349 vs 76826
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 302.4 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 6144 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26506 vs 20002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26506 vs 20002 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16138 vs 13689 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 114349 vs 76826 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 140 Watt
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 3711
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 3711
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 3356
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W vs 140 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 vs 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 vs 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 vs 3356 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 618 vs 616 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 | 10384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 | 10384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 10130 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 10130 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26506 | 20002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26506 | 20002 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 616 | 618 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16138 | 13689 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 114349 | 76826 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA104 | TU104B |
| Place in performance rating | 118 | 119 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1080 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 604.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.35 TFLOPS (1:1) | 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.35 TFLOPS | 5.530 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 151.2 GPixel/s | 69.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 302.4 GTexel/s | 172.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 80 W |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 352.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 6000
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800S
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
