NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile

  • Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 302.4 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s
  • 2.4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2560
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26506 vs 20002
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26506 vs 20002
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16066 vs 13735
  • Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 113509 vs 76051
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1575 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Texture fill rate 302.4 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s
Pipelines 6144 vs 2560
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 26506 vs 20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 26506 vs 20002
PassMark - G3D Mark 16066 vs 13735
Geekbench - OpenCL 113509 vs 76051

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

  • Around 3% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 140 Watt
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 3711
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 3711
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 3356
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 3356
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 620 vs 616
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 930 MHz vs 900 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 W vs 140 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 10384 vs 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 10384 vs 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10130 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10130 vs 3356
PassMark - G2D Mark 620 vs 616

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3711
10384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3711
10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
10130
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
10130
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26506
20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26506
20002
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
616
620
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
16066
13735
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
113509
76051
Name NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3711 10384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3711 10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 10130
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 10130
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 26506 20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 26506 20002
PassMark - G2D Mark 616 620
PassMark - G3D Mark 16066 13735
Geekbench - OpenCL 113509 76051
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7343

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Turing
Code name GA104 TU104B
Place in performance rating 120 121
Launch date 2 Apr 2020
Type Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1575 MHz 1080 MHz
Core clock speed 900 MHz 930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 604.8 GFLOPS (1:32) 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 19.35 TFLOPS (1:1) 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 19.35 TFLOPS 5.530 TFLOPS
Pipelines 6144 2560
Pixel fill rate 151.2 GPixel/s 69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 302.4 GTexel/s 172.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 140 Watt 80 W
Transistor count 17400 million 13600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.1
OpenCL 3.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.6 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 352.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6