NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
- Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 302.4 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26506 vs 20002
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26506 vs 20002
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16066 vs 13735
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 113509 vs 76051
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 302.4 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26506 vs 20002 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26506 vs 20002 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16066 vs 13735 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 113509 vs 76051 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 140 Watt
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 3711
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 3711
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 3356
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 3356
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 620 vs 616
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W vs 140 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 vs 3356 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 620 vs 616 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 | 10384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 | 10384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 10130 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 10130 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26506 | 20002 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26506 | 20002 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 616 | 620 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16066 | 13735 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 113509 | 76051 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU104B |
Place in performance rating | 120 | 121 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1080 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 604.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.35 TFLOPS (1:1) | 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.35 TFLOPS | 5.530 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 151.2 GPixel/s | 69.12 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 302.4 GTexel/s | 172.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 80 W |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 352.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |