NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile

  • 2x more pipelines: 6144 vs 3072
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 6144 vs 3072
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 140 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3355

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

  • Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1575 MHz
  • 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 26506
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 26506
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 616
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19560 vs 16138
  • Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 115519 vs 114349
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1650 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed 1815 MHz vs 1575 MHz
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 27179 vs 26506
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 27179 vs 26506
PassMark - G2D Mark 920 vs 616
PassMark - G3D Mark 19560 vs 16138
Geekbench - OpenCL 115519 vs 114349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3711
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3711
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26506
27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26506
27179
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
616
920
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
16138
19560
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
114349
115519
Name NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3711 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3711 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 26506 27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 26506 27179
PassMark - G2D Mark 616 920
PassMark - G3D Mark 16138 19560
Geekbench - OpenCL 114349 115519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 337.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4566.815
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 31.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 190.996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1654.321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Turing
Code name GA104 TU104
Place in performance rating 118 116
Launch date 23 July 2019
Launch price (MSRP) $699
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1575 MHz 1815 MHz
Core clock speed 900 MHz 1650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 604.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 19.35 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 19.35 TFLOPS
Pipelines 6144 3072
Pixel fill rate 151.2 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 302.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 140 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 17400 million
CUDA cores 3072
Maximum GPU temperature 89 C
Render output units 64

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
Display Port 1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 6 pin + 8 pin
Height 4.556” (115.7mm)
Length 10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 650 Watt
Width 2-Slot

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.1
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.6 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 496 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready