NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1170 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 433.9 GTexel/s vs 279.2 GTexel/s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 8192 vs 5120
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22844 vs 15306
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1042 vs 572
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154511 vs 99679
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1170 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 433.9 GTexel/s vs 279.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8192 vs 5120 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22844 vs 15306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1042 vs 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154511 vs 99679 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1745 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25496 vs 22508
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25496 vs 22508
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1745 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25496 vs 22508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25496 vs 22508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22844 | 15306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1042 | 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154511 | 99679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 25496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 25496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA102 | GA104 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | |
Place in performance rating | 71 | 133 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1745 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1170 MHz | 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 558.4 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 17.87 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | 17.87 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 8192 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | 139.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 433.9 GTexel/s | 279.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |